Legacy Code Refactor
Your 2,000-line controller isn't going to refactor itself. This agent systematically extracts god objects, splits fat controllers, and modernizes patterns—without breaking your production application.
The Legacy Code Trap
Every Rails monolith has them: the files nobody wants to touch. The ones with comments like # TODO: refactor this someday from 2018.
- The God Model:
User.rbwith 3,000 lines and 47 concerns included - The Fat Controller:
OrdersControllerwith 2,000 lines of business logic - The Callback Hell:
before_savechains that nobody understands - The Copy-Paste Virus: Same 50 lines duplicated in 12 different places
Everyone knows it needs fixing. Nobody has the time. And manual refactoring is terrifying because one wrong move breaks production.
How the Agent Works
Complexity Analysis
Maps your entire codebase to find the worst offenders.
- → Calculates cyclomatic complexity, lines of code, and coupling metrics
- → Identifies files with highest "change frequency + complexity" score
- → Prioritizes by impact: which refactors will save the most time?
Dependency Mapping
Understands what depends on what before touching anything.
- → Traces method calls, associations, and callback chains
- → Identifies safe extraction boundaries
- → Maps test coverage for each method being refactored
Service Object Extraction
Moves business logic from controllers and models to dedicated services.
-
→
Creates
app/services/with single-responsibility classes - → Follows your team's existing patterns (or establishes new ones)
- → Maintains identical external behavior—no breaking changes
Concern Decomposition
Breaks bloated models into focused, reusable concerns.
-
→
Groups related methods by domain (e.g.,
User::Authentication,User::Billing) -
→
Extracts shared behavior to
app/models/concerns/ - → Reduces god model from 3,000 lines to 200 lines + focused concerns
Callback Untangling
Replaces implicit callback chains with explicit, testable code.
-
→
Maps the full
before_save/after_commitexecution chain - → Converts to explicit service calls where appropriate
- → Keeps necessary callbacks but documents the "why"
Test Preservation
Ensures every refactor is backed by passing tests.
- → Runs existing tests after each micro-change
- → Adds characterization tests for untested legacy behavior
- → Creates unit tests for newly extracted services
Incremental PRs
Delivers small, reviewable changes—not a massive rewrite.
- → Each PR does one thing: extract one service, split one concern
- → PRs are ordered for safe merge sequence
- → Can pause at any point with a working codebase
What It Refactors
God Objects
Models with 1,000+ lines doing everything at once
Fat Controllers
Business logic that belongs in services or models
Callback Chains
Implicit side effects that make debugging impossible
Duplicated Code
Copy-pasted logic that drifts apart over time
Query Sprawl
Database queries scattered across controllers and views
Mixed Abstractions
HTTP, business logic, and DB in the same method
What This Is NOT
- ✗ Not a rewrite. We refactor incrementally, not "throw it away and start over."
- ✗ Not blind pattern application. We don't add service objects just because. Every change has a reason.
- ✗ Not "make it pretty." The goal is maintainability and velocity, not aesthetics.
- ✗ Not feature work. We don't change behavior—we reorganize structure while preserving functionality.
Typical Results
Before & After
12 services + 6 concerns, fully tested.
Stop Dreading That File
Your legacy code doesn't have to stay legacy. Let's break it down into something your team actually wants to work on.